Skip to main content

Approach On Educating Patient

There are different type of patient. One could have a PhD, or diploma, or a medical staff, and one could never been into a school for life. Approaching a patient sometimes could be difficult to do. A lot of medical staff, and medical student are approaching the patient or a community by going to the patient level of education. 
Almost all the books, or lecturer would say ‘be the same level as the patient so that they could understand’ or whatsoever and almost all medical student and medical staff take this words like a gospel . I have seen many people educating a rural community by getting into that level where they are the same as the people that are educating. For example, when talking about tetanus, so make people understand here in Sabah setting (where I am right now), they would say tetanus is like a seizure, or fits. While in my opinion, this is two different things. 


This would not make so much impact in the outcome of the patient but in long term perspective this could be detrimental. This is because when other medical officer is clerking the same person, in medical history they would say that they once having a seizure making the diagnosis and management differ. 

Another example would be in describing thyroid disease or goiter.  In place I am doing my practical right now, people told me that ‘beguk’ means mumps. While from my experience in Queen Elizabeth hospital in Kota Kinabalu, ‘beguk’ sometimes refer to goiter. Look how much impediment is created here. 

Why would not a medical staff tell a patient the true name of the disease instead of creating a new one in their own language?  A year ago, when I was clerking a patient, the patient said that he once had a ‘paru-paru berair’ to me and I would write in my clerking sheet that the person had a history of pleural effusion or acute pulmonary oedema…(?), while that patient is actually having a pneumonia. So my history was wrong. Was it my fault? Or it is the fault of the previous medical officer that tell the patient a laymen term, too layman term. 

My idea is to change the way a medical staff or student or any doctors whatever educating their patient. For term such as pneumonia, or mumps, or hepatitis B, and etc, should be describe as it is and never be change to other things. However, the explanation part should be detailed. As example, when telling a patient regarding their hyperuracemia, you should tell him/her the exact word, hyperuracaemia. Then you would spend 5-10 minutes telling what is hyperuracaemia. This better than telling a patient that he/she has a ‘kencing masam’ (sour urine), and with only this, a patient may not know what is really going on with him/her. Later in the future, when he/she describe ‘kencing masam’ to another medical officer, I believed no one will know what the hell is that. 

Another things is not to over simplify a fact. For example, when telling a patient regarding immunization, a medical personal would only tell a community or patient something like this. “ Immunisation is done to prevent illness in future, it is not harmful and it is quite safe, your children must take it’. Easy. Simple. Less than 1 minute, and a patient would always comply to take immunization. On the other hand, the patient or community would always never know what is actually a vaccine and why it is given to them. 

Another thing is not to lie to the people. For example when a disease does not have a cure, then why should lie telling that the disease can be cure. For example, if someone have acute viral conjunctivitis, there are not antiviral use to treat because it is self limiting. But many medical personal out there would tell the patient to take this, take that, this would cure you. Why don’t you tell that this problem has not definitive treatment but you can treat the symptoms and tell that it is self limiting. 

Many medical personnel would never think of educating patient but only think to make patient comply. Why? Do we need to keep our community in the same level as this. Of course I am only referring to our community or my community here in Sabah. If someone did not know, here in Sabah, most of the people education of medicine is the same as other places in the world 20 years back, meaning that they were too further in the past. Not progressing into the future. Whose to be blamed here? Not the public not the farmer or fishermen who are lazy to learn, but to medical staff who are lazy to teach. 

Everything is always about time. It is too time consuming to teach detail about a disease. I have no time to talk that much. There are thousand patient waiting for me out there. 

This is the kind of responses you would always get. It is enough if you say honestly, I am lazy to teach. 

We did not need to do a full hour of talk and full hour sitting in a clinic teaching a patient. We did not need to make a patient a doctor yet we need to make them know. It is our responsibility to make them understand about their problem. 

I choose to give a talk on acute viral conjunctivitis today in district health clinic. I would not choose a talk on breastfeeding, or balanced diet because this thing is always has a time to teach. Continuously, people would start to learn regarding this. However, not so many person out there know what is acute viral conjunctivitis even though they usually get it. 

I hope, later in the future, our community would be educated enough to understand. I hope that someday, nurses, assistant medical officer, medical officer or anyone else would try their best to correct the wrong side of educating a patient nowadays. 

In my conclusion, in approaching to educate a patient, I would always spend more time, use the actual term then describe it so patient understand, tell the truth, be a teacher. A teacher would always teach and make student understand. Why don’t the medical staff be a teacher and not only a medical staff forever. 

Comments

  1. banar ki...
    aku masih ingat sal pneumonia tu...
    arwah mamaku kan AMD...pstu pneumonia tu ada sbb AMD tu...
    then, bapaku tnya npa...
    doc tu ckp paru2 berair...
    terus masa tu aku bngung2...
    ak tnya la mkcik ku...
    mkcik ku nurse sahaja...
    ak tnya what is the diffrnt between radang and paru2 berair...
    iya ckp susa mo explain sbb ak xda med knowledge...
    she just said its pneumonia or radang not paru2 berair...

    ReplyDelete
  2. bro... i really have no idea what are u talking about. But i do have faith in you! You'll be a great teacher Onizuka... eh i mean doctor! peace ya'll~

    ReplyDelete
  3. Aku suka bila doktor boleh terangkan dengan jelas apa2 penyakit patient tu. At least yang pesakit tu pun boleh gunakan maklumat tu untuk menambah inisiatif sendiri nak cari jalan mengubati atau mengurangkan penyakit tu, takdela bergantung 100% kat doktor ja.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please leave your comment below.

Popular posts from this blog

Astro Remote volume not responding

I have been looking around for solution when my Astro beyond remote start having problem where it does not want to control the volume of my astro anymore.

The strange thing is, the remote seem fine and only the mute and volume won't respond.

After realizing that the remote cost around rm250 to be replaced, I start thinking that this is not an ordinary remote control.

After a few minutes of research (only) I found out that this remote can be programmed to be synchronize with our television.

Hmmm. So the remote problem must be cause by it some programming error.

Haha.

Turn out of you have similar problem like this, all you had to do is to press OK button with volume down until it bleep 4 times then it will be ok. This method canceled the volume control for the television ( meaning that you can only control the tv volume not the decoder).

Later I found out that if you want, you can use your tv only volume to control the astro thus no hassle to have 2 remote at the same time.

Master in Pathology (Malaysia): A Guide To Apply.

Well, I got carried away in previous post talking about my experience taking entrance exam for Master in Pathology. You can check it here:


Master In Pathology: My Experience Entrance Exam That was not my first attention on trying to write such post. My intention was to share on how to get into that entrance exam in the first place. So here it is. A step by step guide on how to get yourself into the entrance exam. 
A Guide to Apply for Master in Pathology (Mpath) 
1. Make up your mind. I've seen a few of my friends who apply for this pathway and get confused before it begin. Ask yourself, are you really interested in Pathology? Do you know what pathology is? Do you know what kind of work are you going to do in Pathology. 
Most of the time, people thought pathology MO or specialist were all just sitting down drinking coffee and chit chat all day long. No work to do. Think again. The best thing to do is to get yourself into the department itself. Work as a pathology MO first, in a few…

Becoming a medical officer in Malaysia: Are you still a real doctor?

To recap from my previous post, a person must completed 5-6 years study in medical school, pass their professional exam, enter 2 years house officer training program, pass their exam and completed their logbooks, then a person can now be called a fully registered Medical Officer / Medical Doctor.

A Journey of a Junior Medical Officer

After 7 or 8 years experience, a house officer will be given a full registration under Malaysian Medical Council. This registration process is a lengthy process which takes up months before it will be completed. Most doctors will apply for full registration 4 months before they finish their house officer training program. The registration will be processed only if all the criteria has been fulfilled by the house officer which includes log book, review by a board of specialist, no disciplinary action recorded, and other paper work stuff that need to be settled. A full registration means that the doctor now can practice as a doctor independently. They can wo…